The Invisible Web

Your Trip Into the Chapel Perilous

Archive for July 15th, 2008

E3 Summary Thread for July 15, 2008

Posted by invizweb on July 15, 2008

– Around 3:36 PM EST (15:36), one of DC Comics’ top artists Jim Lee appeared on stage to unveil DC Universe online, Sony Online Entertainment’s pet project MMORPG for the Playstation 3 console, where players can choose to play the role of heroes or villains. From the trailers, the Joker, Nightwing, Solomon Grundy, Sinestro, Bane, Poison Ivy, Batman, Wonder Woman, Superman, the Flash, the Green Lantern (Hal Jordan?), and Catwoman amongst a universe of others will be in the game. It is not likely that the game will include the Vertigo universe. (Source: G4TV live coverage)

SquareSoft has ended his exclusivity policy and will simultaneously release Final Fantasy XIII for the X-Box 360 and PS3 release will occur, in Europe and North America, whenever that will be. The exclusivity remains for the PS3 in Japan. Final Fantasy XIII is the story of tomboyish Lightning (the strawberry blonde female in the trailers) and the quest she was sent on by the Crystals, who are sentient beings in this world.

More to come.

Advertisements

Posted in Current Events | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

RAW: “Conspiracies and TSOG”

Posted by invizweb on July 15, 2008

Robert Anton Wilson (C)

Robert Anton Wilson (C)

RAW on Psych Salon

In eight days time, it will be Robert Anton Wilson Day in Santa Cruz, California. Robert Anton Wilson is someone I highly respect and although it sounds corny, his work changed my life. To preview next week’s Wilson festivities here is an episode of the Psychedelic Salon with RAW on the Tsarist Occupational Government, or TSOG.

Posted in Anamolous Phenomena/ Forteana, Civil Liberties and Social Justice, Cryptopolitics, Current Events, Philosophy & Religion & Spirituality | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

The FBI’s plan to “profile” Muslims

Posted by invizweb on July 15, 2008

Thanks to Ralph Bernardo at Disinfo

By Juan Cole for Salon

It’s unconstitutional, un-American — and it might hurt, rather than help, the FBI’s effort to stop real acts of terror.

The U.S. Justice Department is considering a change in the grounds on which the FBI can investigate citizens and legal residents of the United States. Till now, DOJ guidelines have required the FBI to have some evidence of wrongdoing before it opens an investigation. The impending new rules, which would be implemented later this summer, allow bureau agents to establish a terrorist profile or pattern of behavior and attributes and, on the basis of that profile, start investigating an individual or group. Agents would be permitted to ask “open-ended questions” concerning the activities of Muslim Americans and Arab-Americans. A person’s travel and occupation, as well as race or ethnicity, could be grounds for opening a national security investigation.

The rumored changes have provoked protests from Muslim American and Arab-American groups. The Council on American Islamic Relations, among the more effective lobbies for Muslim Americans’ civil liberties, immediately denounced the plan, as did James Zogby, the president of the Arab-American Institute. Said Zogby, “There are millions of Americans who, under the reported new parameters, could become subject to arbitrary and subjective ethnic and religious profiling.” Zogby, who noted that the Bush administration’s history with profiling is not reassuring, warned that all Americans would suffer from a weakening of civil liberties.

In fact, Zogby’s statement only begins to touch on the many problems with these proposed rules. The new guidelines would lead to many bogus prosecutions, but they would also prove counterproductive in the effort to disrupt real terror plots. And then there’s Attorney General Michael Mukasey’s rationale for revising the rules in the first place. “It’s necessary,” he explained in a June news conference, “to put in place regulations that will allow the FBI to transform itself as it is transforming itself into an intelligence-gathering organization.” When did Congress, or we as a nation, have a debate about whether we want to authorize the establishment of a domestic intelligence agency? Indeed, late last month Congress signaled its discomfort with the concept by denying the FBI’s $11 million funding request for its data-mining center.

Establishing a profile that would aid in identifying suspects is not in and of itself illegal, though the practice generally makes civil libertarians nervous. When looking for drug couriers, Drug Enforcement Agency agents were permitted by the Supreme Court in United States v. Sokolow (1989) to use indicators such as the use of an alias, nervous or evasive behavior, cash payments for tickets, brief trips to major drug-trafficking cities, type of clothing, and the lack of checked luggage. This technique, however, specifically excluded the use of skin color or other racial features in building the profile.

In contrast, using race and ethnicity as the — or even a — primary factor in deciding whom to stop and search, despite being widespread among police forces, is illegal. Just this spring, the Maryland State Police settled out of court with the ACLU and an African-American man after having been sued for the practice of stopping black and Latino men and searching them for drugs. New Jersey police also got into trouble over stopping people on the grounds of race.

More here.

Posted in Civil Liberties and Social Justice, Current Events, Geopolitics | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »